Incompatibility between iOS and Android backup/sync systems,.Microsoft account login necessary for backup/sync (Android version only),.Greatly simplified Microsoft account login,.No account required (as long as you keep cloud backup disabled),.PIN-, fingerprint-, or Face ID–protected access,.Second, Microsoft Authenticator needs about 10 times the storage space of Google Authenticator, 150MB–200MB compared with 15MB–20MB. For users of devices with different operating systems, that would be a deal-breaker. First, the Android and iOS apps use completely incompatible cloud backup systems, and you can’t transfer tokens any other way. Microsoft Authenticator: Not bad, but why so big? Microsoft Authenticator also comes in handy if you work with Microsoft accounts regularly, in which case you do not need to enter a code, just tap the button in the app to confirm login. For example, it can hide codes on the screen and store tokens in the cloud, and both the iOS and Android versions protect app logins. They’re partly justified: The Microsoft app includes a few useful additions to the basic set of features. Many people looking for an alternative to Google Authenticator turn to Microsoft Authenticator based solely on the reputation of the developer. Google Authenticator lacks some useful features, but if you don’t want to get involved with storing tokens in the cloud, it’s a decent option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |